Cemeteries, Genealogy, Photography

Sarah and William and Nell and Louis

IMG_0650
Graver Marker of Sarah and William Frost
Dunn Cemetery, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana

And on the subject of people’s dead relations… I’ve been running into genealogical road blocks because my great grandmother’s surname is not at all common. I’ve found a lot of Basquills, and they are surely all related in some way, but I can’t get farther back than my great-great-great grandfather, Michael.

I’ve had the opposite problem with my great grandfather’s name. Do y’all know how many Louis Thompsons there are and/or were? Lordy! I finally managed to grab at a thread that lead me to a 1910 census record for his family, though.

1910 US Federal Census
Louis Thompson b. 1904
Fulton County, Georgia
William B. Thompson age 34
Estelle Thompson age 34
Douglas Thompson age 11
Russell Thompson age 11
Beulah Thompson age 8
Louis Thompson age 6
Miller Thompson age 4
Estelle Thompson age 2
Warren Thompson 6/12 (6 months)

Each of those names is another thread that might lead to more information and yet more threads. Most importantly, I now have the names of his parents, along with approximate birth years. If those don’t pan out, I can look for information on his siblings, and see if someone else has traced them backwards.

It’s dry stuff, I know, but it totally made my day.

Cemeteries, Crankypantsing, Genealogy, Photography

Fragments

IMG_0515
Fragment of Grave Marker
Covenanter Cemetery, Bloomington, Indiana

This was taken last weekend. It’s cheating, but since I didn’t post a photo yesterday and didn’t even touch my camera today, I’m not going to feel guilty about it. Heck, I very nearly didn’t post at all today. Damned DST[1]. It’s past my bedtime already!

Where did this day go, anyway? It seems like I didn’t get a thing done, because I wasted it chasing my tail trying to solve a couple of genealogical puzzles. A fragment here and a fragment there. I did manage to figure out that I could merge two individuals–yay! I also found my great-great aunt Margaret’s husband in the US census records for 1910 and 1920. I guess that’s progress of a sort, right?

And now I have to go figure out what to make for lunch tomorrow. I have a feeling it’s going to involve broccoli and rice and maybe some granny smith apples. But not all together. That would be disgusting.

___________________________________
1. Every day during DST, when my alarm goes off at the unholy hour of 3:30 am Indiana time, I’m going to be reminded of what a sadistic fucking bastard Mitch Daniels is. Note to Mitch: You are henceforth and forevermore stricken from my Christmas Holiday card list!

Genealogy

Another Puzzle

So I spent literally all weekend doing genealogy research. A good chunk of that was trying to sort out a couple of weird puzzles. There’s a Nicholas Basquill b. 1825 (according to 1880 US census) who married an Eliza Hogshough (b. 1842 according to 1880 US census). Now, I had an inkling that Eliza’s last name had a more standard spelling, but I couldn’t figure it out, and since I had no information about her other than an estimated birth date, there wasn’t much to go on.

That was last spring, and I put the puzzle away, because I was at a dead end.

Then, this weekend, while looking at another pocket of Basquills, I came across an Honoria Hawkshaw. The name rang a bell. Aha! So I started looking for Elizabeth Hawkshaws, and lo and behold, there she was, along with siblings, a mother, and a father. Not bad.

However, I got to looking at three different sources I found, and they all had Eliza’s husband’s birth date as 1816. That would make him 26 years older than her. Not impossible, but unlikely. It would also be an odd error to find on a census form. Yeah, some of them are off by a few years, but 26? I don’t think so.

One source also stated that Nicholas b. 1916 came to the US with his brothers Michael and John, and that he later returned to Ireland, married Eliza, and brought her back to the US. It’s possible.

Another source I uncovered states that Nicholas b. 1816 is the father of Nicholas b. 1925. Did they even think about that for a minute? It’s not absolutely impossible, but it’s so unlikely that it may as well be. So something is fishy there. I think there are two different Nicholas Basquills. I think the 1880 census is correct, and that references I’ve found listing Nicholas b. 1816 as Eliza’s husband have gotten hold of the wrong one.

And now, I’m wondering, were Michael and John brothers of the 1825 or the 1816 Nicholas? And if they are actually brothers of Nicholas b. 1816 (assuming he actually existed), could that Michael be the father Walter (my great-great-grandfather)? I wish I had enough information to connect those two chunks of Basquills, but I don’t.

Genealogy

Apple-Cranberry

I stopped at the grocery store on my way home yesterday, against my better judgment. I hate the milk-toilet paper-bread buying frenzy that possesses everyone when a storm hits. But, I needed cat litter, and I figured, if I was going to stop, I should pick up some veggies and rice, too. I wandered through the juice aisle, thinking I’d pick up some V8, when I got distracted by the cranberry juice. I suddenly remembered that I had half a bottle of sour apple vodka at home, and if you can’t drink during an ice storm, when can you drink?

After spending all day test driving GEDCOM-to-HTML converters, I’m completely brain dead, and thankful for my foresight in buying mixer. Aaah! I’m pretty sure that I’ve never, ever had such a damnfine tasty beverage.

As for the GEDCOM-to-HTML converters, ugh. I didn’t find one I liked well enough to fork over money for, and the free ones I tried didn’t make me happy, so I ended up back where I originally started. After making a few spelling corrections and fixing and adding information that some very kind relatives in Ireland sent me, I settled for just exporting the family tree directly from the database I use. I’m not in love with the format of the web pages it creates, but until I find something I like better, I guess that’s what I’ll use. If nothing else, I can be reasonably sure that it won’t convert living flags to dead (oops!). There’s nothing quite like prematurely killing off one’s relatives, eh?

Oh, and it’s still icy out, and not in a remotely pretty way, so I didn’t even try to go out and take photos. I think what that means is that there will be no PotD today.

Oh, andalsotoo! I did get to see the eclipse the other night! The sky cleared up very nicely. It was absolutely beautiful. Harriet wussed out on me after about 15 minutes, so she spent the rest of the time standing inside the patio door, staring disgustedly at me. I think she was convinced that I was up to No Good.

Genealogy

The Basquills

I’ve gotten three e-mails in the last week from family members in Ireland who found my genealogy pages. I’m excited, obviously, but at the same time, it scares the hell out of me. I’ve been ambivalent about this family history project. On the one hand, I want to know, but on the other, gawdalmighty, the responsibility!

So, I’m trying to write an email to a 70 year old great uncle first cousin twice removed (he’s my grandma’s cousin). I’m having some sort of serious social anxiety attack, and it’s not pretty. And when I finish this email, I have to email a third cousin (named Sinead, I kid you not). She’s the great-granddaughter of my great-grandma Nell’s brother. And then there’s another Basquill who contacted me (don’t know how she’s related, but obviously, she is somehow).

Aieee!

Genealogy, Meta

Light Housekeeping

I spent most of the afternoon playing around with CSS and reorganizing my genealogy website. It’s tedious work, so when the mood strikes, it’s best to go with it. I found a gorgeous CC licensed image to use as a banner, which is what set me off. It was taken in County Galway, not Mayo, but they are both in the west country, so I decided to use it anyway.

And, of course, the reorganization means that the family tree page I posted last night has been moved.

Genealogy

More Fun with Genealogy

I’ve been test driving a couple of different genealogy programs. One of them, Family Historian, seems to be pretty decent. The variety of reports and HTML it is able to export is far superior to the Cumberland program I’ve been using. It’s shareware, with a 30 day trial period, but the price tag isn’t bad (US$56.00).

Anyway, I’ve re-configured the Basquill family tree page. Instead of umpty confusing pages linking together, it’s all on one page, descending from Michael Basquill. I haven’t taken a close look at the documentation, but there does not appear to be an easy way to chop up one report into multiple web pages. Even with only five generations, and scant information for many of them, the report I did would have made for 9 printed pages. That’s a lot of scrolling. It would be straightforward to divide the tree by creating multiple reports, though, so it’s not a deal breaker.

Some of the text is a little goofy, because it was imported from another program. Most fields seemed to map logically to fields in the new program, but there are a few that did not, which resulted in goofy things like, “He experienced LIVD: Lived in Killadeer” or the (to me) hilariously funny repetition of “He died.”[1]

______________________________
[1] Ms. Lea might find that amusing, too. We took a humanities class together in high school, and in discussion one day, the phrase “And then he died” cropped up several times. You had to be there, I guess, but by the end of the period, everyone in the class was giggling.

Genealogy, Letters to Esther

A Puzzle

Esther Munro and Edith Kilbury

I’m not sure where the weekend went. I spent most of it trying to unsnarl a couple of problems in Esther’s family tree. It’s a little bit shocking how much of a time suck genealogy can be.

The problem was that several generations back, a man named Luke Dillon–“a Quaker by faith”–supposedly fell in love with a girl named Susannah Garrett. Her father–who was, of course, rich and powerful–did not approve, presumably because Luke was a A) a drunk1 and/or B) poor. The two love birds eloped and emigrated from County Armagh, Ireland to Nantucket, Massachusetts, in either 1709 or 1724. They had four children (or maybe six). If they emigrated in 1709, one child (or maybe two) was born in Ireland, one was born at sea (or maybe Nantucket), and two (or maybe three) were born in either Nantucket or Bucks County, Pennsylvania. If they emigrated in 1724, all were born in Ireland. Except, of course, the one who was mysteriously born at sea.

And all that does not account for how Susannah could have been born in Guilford County, North Carolina, but magically elope from County Armagh, Ireland with the love of her life, a drunken weaver man.

Anyway, most everyone agrees that Luke died in 1716 or 1717. He either got drunk, fell off his horse, rolled into a ditch, and froze to death, or he climbed off his horse, sat under a tree, got drunk, and froze to death. Regardless of which end he allegedly met, the story says his body was not found until the spring thaw.

Susannah, of course, was pregnant at the time and gave birth to Luke Jr. after his father’s death. She remarried, either to a man named Bridges, or a man named Peter Dillon. Peter may have been Luke’s brother, or his cousin, or even his father, or the names may have been purely coincidental.

Or the whole story may be just that, a story. See, as far as I can tell, there is no actual evidence that Luke Dillon ever existed. There was a Susannah (who may or may not have been a Garrett), who was (probably) born in America, and she had four children–one of them, Daniel, was an ancestor of Esther–and she was married to a man named Peter Dillon. That much seems to be borne out by actual evidence–tax records, land deeds, etc. It’s amazing to me, though, how many folks claim that the “Luke and Susannah” story is true. Some even go so far as to state that they have “evidence” because it was published in a book, written by a descendant of Luke and Susannah. Because, you know, if it’s in print, it cannot be a lie! (I actually laughed out loud when I read the above “I have a book that proves it!” response on a Dillon family message board.)

Aieee!

Photo: Esther Munro and Edith Kilbury, Piper City, Illinois, circa 1915 (courtesy of Cheryl Ford)

_________________________________
1 I would think that being a drunk would have gotten one kicked out of the Friends, but who knows?