Crankypantsing, Genealogy

Not Today, Shirley

I got these Findagrave edit suggestions today. The death location did need to be changed, so I approved it, but the other three? Why? Why would you remove a bio? Why would you make the birth location less specific? And the birth date is just plain wrong.

The information in the suggested edits came from the death certificate, which Shirley has helpfully added an image of to the Findagrave memorial. She has some salty words for people who don’t like that, in her Findagrave profile.

DeathCert_MaryAgnesGlynn1960

You can see the parents’ first names are not included, and the birth date is incorrect. The birth location is also not specific. Just Ireland.

BirthRegister_MaryAgnesBasquill_1882

Mary Agnes was the daughter of Patrick Basquil and Bridget Hynes (also spelled Hines and Hinds). She was born 20 Dec 1882 in Lackaun, a townland in Aughagower Civil Parish, County Mayo.

Findagrave does not play well with Irish place names, so the most specific you can get for this location is Aughagower, County Mayo, Ireland. That’s it. But I added the full birth location, the baptismal information, and the parents’ names in the bio. Which Shirley wanted me to remove.

BaptismalRegister_MaryAgnesBasquill_1882

The baptismal register image is dark and difficult to read, but it backs up the birth information. She was born in Lukane (or Likane? a variant spelling for Lackaun) and baptized 29 Dec 1882 in Aughagower Catholic Parish. The parents were listed as Patt Baskwell (or possibly Baskuell, which would be a new one for my collection) and Bridget Hynes. I’m pretty confident of my paper trail, and I’m pretty confident I have my facts straight and correct.

WHY? I really don’t understand. The edits she requested amount to vandalism, and they make absolutely no logical sense to me. I can understand using the information in the death certificate if you don’t have better, more reliable information available. That’s how it goes sometimes. But we have a very nice paper trail for Mary Agnes. We don’t need to rely on incomplete or incorrect information from a death record.

Crankypantsing, Genealogy

Exactish

This is infuriating. When searching Ancestry for Indiana death certificates, exact does not mean exact. This doesn’t seem to be an issue with most other databases (though I’ve noticed it happening in Ancestry’s SSDI index, too). So it looks like you’ve gotten 31 hits for your search, only no, it’s really just 13. This isn’t a huge deal when you only get a short list of returns, but if you’re dealing with a common name, the list can be overwhelming. Even more so when you find the list is actually 2-3 times as long as it needs to be.

If I wanted the date to be a range, I’d have set it up that way in my search criteria.

Genealogy

Strong Unrecommend

I need to stop trawling Reddit. This workflow strikes me as incredibly awkward and labor intensive. Maybe it’s because of my job, but my first quibble is with the naming convention. I organize by document type. Some people organize documents by surname, and that’s fine. But I try to keep file names as short as possible. The word “federal” is superfluous. There is no other kind of US census. Second, I’d use underscores to separate segments. I also prefer names in direct order, not reversed order, probably because my one name study documents are intermixed with my own family’s documents. It’s far easier to look for John Basquil than try to figure out which one of the 50+ variants of Basquill the document is filed under, then look for John. John is much less likely to have an alternate spelling. So in my system, that file name would be: Census_US1900_DavidSmith

Short and sweet, and it takes seconds to find what I’m looking for. If it were a state census, you’d obviously use the two letter state abbreviation with the census year: Census_MN1905_DavidSmith

But that highlighted bit is the part that made me break out in hives. I use Evernote for genealogy. As I download document images (full resolution images, not clips or screenshots*), I add them to Evernote with the link for the page I got them from. When I’ve finished adding the information to my database and have finished creating my citation, I copy the citation and add it to the note in Evernote. It adds maybe a few seconds to my workflow, and it’s time well spent. You could just as easily copy and paste the Ancestry/FamilySearch/etc. citation into the note, too.

Evernote is set up like my files are set up, by document type. I’m careful to format names in note titles consistently, so I can use quote marks to find all the documents related a person. But everything is keyword searchable (even the handwriting in documents), so it’s trivial to locate a given note. And best of all, all my documents are available anywhere I have an internet connection.

I can and do, of course, add other information to notes when it’s helpful. So if I want to add abstracts or transcriptions, I can.

I think OneNote has a lot of the same functionality, though I admit I don’t love it and only use it for managing citation templates. And I’m guessing there are other note management apps that might work better than a series of spreadsheets, screenshots, and text files. (I do use Excel for tracking and managing residential addresses from city directories, and it works okay for that. I keep that spreadsheet in Evernote, as well.)

* I would never recommend just screenshotting document images from Ancestry, specifically. Some of them are impossible to read, because they’ve compressed the screen view image so much. In order to even read them, you have to download them. But all their images are compressed to some degree in the screen viewer. Always download the full, best quality image available. If you want to crop a smaller section later, you can, but you can’t go backward if you’ve only saved a portion of a document image. And sometimes you realize later that there’s information in other parts of the document that is useful.

Genealogy
Letters

In the mid-1990s, when I was visiting my grandparents, grandma showed me a stack of letters that had belonged to her mother, Nell Basquill. They were written by Nell’s brother, William.

She sent me to the library with grandpa, to photocopy them, because she’d decided I would want them. I have no idea why she thought that.

I read them, and they didn’t make any sense to me. I put them away, and two moves later, I found them in a box of papers. That little stack of letters was what got me interested in genealogy.

I still don’t know who some of the people mentioned by William were. But every time I look at them, I figure out another little piece of the puzzle.

Hubert Martin Keane (1878-1957)

My most recent mystery was Hubert Martin Keane. I found him living with Mary Anne Baskwell in Boston in the 1940 census. I almost ignored him as just a random lodger, but since he was born in Ireland, I thought I’d try to find him in the civil birth register.

It turns out he was easy to pin down. He was born 9 Dec 1878 in Slaugar, County Mayo, and his parents were Michael Keane and Bridget Baskville.

It can’t have been a coincidence that the daughter of William Baskuil was living with the son of Bridget Baskville. I thought maybe they were first cousins, and that Bridget may have been an as yet unidentified daughter of Michael Basquil and Margaret Kelly, my great grandma Nell’s grandparents. (Mary Ann was the daughter of Walter’s brother, William, and Anne Gibbons. So Mary Anne and my great grandma Nell were first cousins.)

I thought there might be something in those old letters that could help, so I pulled them out. I hit the jackpot, but it wasn’t the one I wanted to hit.

Letter from William Basquil to his sister Nell, 9 Jun 1974

“Mrs. O Hara a granddaughter of Uncle Dennis told me that Dad’s [Walter’s] only sister Aunt Margarett lived in Boston & was married to a man named Bourke, did you ever contact her.”

Walter only had one sister, Margaret Theresa Basquil, who did indeed marry a man named Thomas Burke. She came to the US in the mid-1870s and died in Boston. So Bridget Baskville is not one of Walter’s sisters, which means that Hubert Keane is not a first cousin to Mary Ann Baskwell.

I still think there was a relationship between Bridget Baskville and my Basquills. It’s just too much of a coincidence, otherwise.

Genealogy

Bridget Bourke

Grave Marker

My aunt and her husband are in Ireland. She asked me if there was anything I wanted her to look for while she was there. They were planning to visit the are my great grandma Nell came from, so I asked if she could look for Nell’s parents’ graves.

Bridget Bourke was Nell’s mother she was Walter Basquil’s second wife. They married in 1886. Walter died in 1925 and Bridget in 1938 (the date on the stone is incorrect).

I don’t know where Walter is buried, which is annoying. It isn’t like it’s an ancient grave, so he should be there. But at least I know where Bridget is.

Fun fact: Walter was a carpenter and moonlighted as a coffin maker.

Genealogy, Photography

Martha Jane or Lula

Untitled

I don’t think I’ve shared this. I’m not sure who she is, but she was in with a bunch of old family photos my mom sent to me to digitize. It’s in really bad condition, unfortunately. The photo studio was in Atlanta, so it’s likely one of my grandma Jeanne’s great grandmothers. My best guess is that it’s either Lula Cox or Martha Jane Edmonds.

Lula Cox married Henry Lewis Hoover. A bunch of trees on Ancestry have incorrectly linked to parents of a different Lula Cox, which is unfortunate. I don’t know who my Lula’s parents are, and I don’t even know when she and Henry Hoover married. She was born about 1847 in either Georgia or Alabama and died in 1909. Henry died in 1904. Both are buried in Hollywood Cemetery, in Atlanta, in unmarked graves.

Martha Jane Edmonds is the daughter of Asa T. Edmonds and Nancy Guice. She was born in 1846 in Walton County, Georgia and married James R. Thompson in 1869. He died in 1919 and she died in 1917, and both are buried in Greenwood Cemetery in Atlanta. (Holy crap! I hadn’t checked their memorials recently. Some lovely person has added photos of their grave markers.)

Both James Thompson and Henry Hoover were Civil War veterans, on the wrong side, and both were totally bananapants. Both were wounded. James lost an arm and was one of the few Confederate soldiers to be granted a pension.

I wish I knew whether this photo is of Lula or Martha Jane. It’s infuriating not to know!

Crankypantsing, Genealogy

More Fun with Genealogy

Someone on Reddit posted about this entry on the FamilySearch tree. It’s delightfully entertaining. First, the “Important research has been done on this person,” note. Understand that anyone can add anything they want to the FamilySearch tree, but it should be factual and supported by some sort of evidence. I’m not criticizing people’s beliefs or religion. Believe what you want! I certainly do. But this has no place in genealogy.

Must we? And the arguments in the change log about definitive proofs and whether or not Joseph should be linked as his father and whether or not he really married Mary Magdelene and did they actually have children. There’s a place for those discussions, but I don’t think this is it.

This is my favorite part. Under “Facts,” which ought to be at least somewhat fact-adjacent, right? His physical appearance: “Curly bright silver grey hair. Aquamarine blue eyes (Post resurrection reports)”

I’m seriously tempted to replace the profile pic with Black Jesus. I’m feelin’ fighty.

Genealogy

I did a thing

I kept running into “So Cath Cem” as a burial location in a death register for Fall River, Massachusetts. I spent way too much time trying to figure out where this cemetery was, or if it was even still in existence.

I tried searching FindAGrave for a bunch of the people buried there. I was hoping that if I could find just one, it would tell me the current name of the cemetery. I didn’t get any hits.

I scoured old city directories for Fall River. Often they have useful things like lists of parks and their locations, old city maps containing streets that are no longer in existence, and names and addresses of cemeteries. No luck.

I was starting to think maybe the land had been repurposed, which would have been sadcakes.

Oh, and Google was no help at all. Totally useless.

But then it occurred to me that I should search old Fall River newspapers. I was thinking, if the cemetery had been paved over, moved, or renamed, there might be an article in the paper. I hit the jackpot. I found a funeral notice for a priest buried there, and he has a FindAGrave memorial in St. Marys Cemetery. Another article mentioned South Catholic Cemetery being next to McMahon Street. McMahon Street runs along the west edge of St. Marys Cemetery.

I emailed FindAGrave this morning and requested they add an AKA, so that other people don’t spend hours chasing around in circles. They were fast! It’s already been added.

Tiny victories, y’all.

Genealogy, Photography

More Old Photos

I don’t even know how I missed it when I was scanning these negatives, but my grandpa Mert’s family had a Boston Terrier when he was a kid. That top photo is of him and his horse, Queen, and their family’s dog.

The middle photo is of Fritz, the dog my grandma Jeanne’s mom had when she was a kid. So both my grandma and grandpa had Boston Terriers when they were growing up.

The bottom photo is another one I didn’t really register, when I scanned it. It was with my grandpa Mert’s dad’s negatives. I’m pretty sure it’s of grandpa’s mom’s parents, Clarissa Perry and Homer Charles Lord. It was probably taken in the late 1930s.

Homer Charles Lord and Clarisa A. Perry Wedding Portrait 1897
Wedding Portrait 1897
Homer Charles Lord and Clarisa A. Perry, about 1915
about 1915
img050a
bigger photo from my journal entry, 1930s?