Art

Goodbye, Nina B.

I found out this morning that my favorite painting instructor, Nina Marshall, passed away. She was she an amazing artist and a damned fine teacher. She also lead wonderful critiques. She knew how to get everyone in the class to really see the works. Her critiques weren’t just about her own response to the work; in Nina’s critiques, everyone participated. That didn’t happen in some of my other studio classes, which I think is unfortunate. If you don’t learn how to look at your own art critically, how can you expect to progress and grow?

And, since I’m on the subject of favorite art teachers, I went a-Googling for Dan Fruits. He aggravated me no end, and, before we came to an agreement on How Things Should Be, he had me fleeing the studio in tears on more than one occasion. I wouldn’t trade that experience for anything. Two of the many things I learned from him:

  • Everything can become an excuse to draw.
  • Do not get too attached to the preciousness of what you create.

Which brings me back to Nina B. Perhaps the most important thing I learned from her was that everything is underpaint. If you don’t like what you’ve created, then it’s obviously not done yet and needs another layer of paint. It’s easier to adopt this attitude if you’ve accepted Dan Fruits’ second tenet. And, really, it’s not a bad philosophy for life in general. The closet Buddhist in me likes that it allows for infinite do-overs.

So, Nina B., whatever you were painting, I hope you were able to finish it. And, if you weren’t, I hope you get a do-over.

Art

Art Excavation

I spent the afternoon going through stacks of old work, most of it from when I was in school. I found the whole endeavor pretty amusing, so I thought I’d share. And remember, it’s okay to laugh!

Inside Pandora's Box V

Inside Pandora's Box IV

Inside Pandora's Box III

Inside Pandora's Box II

Inside Pandora's Box I
Inside Pandora’s Box (AKA Great Butts Alive)
oil pastel on charcoal paper mounted to cardboard
25 x 19 inches

The figure drawing is pretty awful, but this is the project that made me fall in love with oil pastels. I love the glowing translucence and blendability. It’s tedious, but if you layer and blend them well, the result is gorgeous.

Figure I
litho crayon on newsprint
18 x 12 inches

Figure II
graphite and ink wash on newsprint
18 x 12 inches

Nude II
ink on paper
18 x 12 inches

Skeleton II
graphite on paper
24 x 18 inches

Skeleton I
pencil on newsprint
24 x 18 inches

I still love drawing bones. The newsprint in the second skeleton drawing has yellowed quite a bit. I had to really knock up the contrast in order to get the pencil to show up.

Figure III
Gesture drawing
litho crayon on newsprint
18 x 24 inches

I haven’t done gesture type drawings in ages–probably not since I finished school. I didn’t appreciate this one at the time, but I kind of like it now.

Hand with Leaf
Hand with Leaf
ink and pencil on paper
12 x 18 inches

Stippling is right damn tedious, which is probably why I didn’t finish this drawing. I just don’t have the patience for it. I like the way it looks, though.

Weeping Willow
Weeping Willow
watercolor on 140lb hot press paper
3 3/4 x 5 1/2 inches

I hated watercolor class. I don’t feel like I learned how to handle the materials (or even what proper materials to use). The critiques weren’t helpful, either. I would much rather have a mean, but honest, critique than a nicey-nice one. The instructor seemed more concerned with not hurting people’s feelings than with giving us useful information. Hrmph. And that’s when I got a critique. Half the time, she skipped right over my work. I assumed at the time that she just didn’t have time for anyone who wasn’t a watercolor major. This is the only thing I was able to salvage from that class. Pathetic, isn’t it?

Cougar
Sleeping Cougar
Prismacolor on toned paper
12 x 12 inches

This is part of a triptych. The assignment was to show something morphing, so I changed a house cat into a cougar. The other two drawings have gotten damaged, but that’s probably just as well. They’re really not good. I love the rocks in this one, though, and the way the cougar blends into them.

Absurdist Theater
Absurdist Theater (or The Onion Head Bird People)
acrylic and oil on 140lb rough watercolor paper
15 x 22 inches

This is just a silly painting that resulted from me wanting to use up some odds and ends on my palette. I swiped the paper from the trash can in the painting studio. It’d been thoughtfully primed with a coat of black gesso.

Art, Crankypantsing

The ATC Debacle and WTF?

On a couple of mail lists I belong to, the subject of people selling Artist Trading Cards (ATCs) has come up. ATCs were the brainchild of a Swiss artist. In the mid-1990s he came up with the idea of small (3.5 x 2.5 inch) original works of art that would be traded in person. The only stipulations were that they would be a certain size and that they would be swapped, not sold. Other than that, anything goes. The idea was that artists would meet in person and trade their small works of art. It would be a way for artists (most of whom aren’t rolling in money) to collect artwork from other artists.

So what’s the big deal? Well, quite a few folks are selling “ATCs” on eBay, which has spawned much discussion. The pro camp says, rightly, that people can do whatever they want with the art they create. The con camp says, also rightly, that selling ATCs undermines the purpose of ATCs and goes against the originator’s intent. While I would personally not support an artist who sold ATCs, it is their right to do so.

Of greater concern to me is the possibility that ATCs that have been traded to others will be sold and resold. As artists trade ATCs with the understanding that they will not be sold, I think it constitutes a breach of contract to turn around and sell an ATC that was received in trade. I think that doing so is mercenary, dishonest, and exploitative.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I also seem to be plagued by assberets who cannot read for comprehension. There’s nothing so irritating to me as making a point, then having someone respond to that point with something completely irrelevant to the point. What are they teaching in schools these days?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A few days ago, in another group, someone asked why there was a dearth of African or African-American imagery in the crafting community. I responded that I didn’t think there was a shortage of such imagery (just Google for African American quilts). I’m sure all the African American artists, artisans, and craftsmen would be surprised to know that their works don’t exist. Even more so all the artists in Africa.

But, that apparently wasn’t her real question. She actually wanted to know why more whites weren’t incorporating African or African American imagery in their art. M’kay.

I don’t feel a burning need to incorporate African or African American imagery in my own art. My art tends to be about me and my experiences. I also don’t know anything about what it feels like to be African American, much less African, so I’m not likely to address it in my art. I do use a wider variety of imagery in my gluebooks, but I consider gluebooks to be separate from my other art. Pretty much all the imagery in my gluebooks comes from magazines, books, etc. so I use what I have. (Thank you, though, to the kind soul who informed me that Egypt is in Africa. Who knew?!)

What sent me over the edge, and finally prompted me to unsubscribe from the group, was when the original poster made a comment that “we” should explore different cultures and that “we” should incorporate more design elements from other cultures in our artwork. If the concern is, as she claimed, to gain cultural understanding through exploring African American artistic styles, then that seems to me to be reducing the African American Experience (as if there’s just the one) to a design element. (Pardon me while I vomit.)

  1. She doesn’t know bupkis about me and my culture, so she can hardly know what my experience with “other cultures” might be.
  2. Why do I, as an artist, have any sort of responsibility to address cultural differences or racial issues?
  3. Talking about African Americans as if they’re from a different planet is probably not the best way to go about engendering racial harmony and mutual understanding.
  4. Reducing an entire group of people to a design element is exploitative
  5. Instead of exploiting African Americans, which is what I feel the OP was encouraging, why not first educate yourselves enough to know why the entire discussion, as it unfolded, might be offensive?

The final straw, though, was that I received an e-mail from someone wanting to know if I’d be interested in an “ancestor swap.” I didn’t answer her, because I was gobsmacked. I have no idea how to reply to something like that. My ancestors are mine, mine, mine and I’m not inclined to share them. If you want to acquire fake ancestors, buy a box of orphaned ones at a flea market.

No, I lied. The final, final straw was the way everyone went around patting themselves on the back for having such a sensitive, understanding, thoughtful discussion. Okaythen.